<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CCHIT Town Call</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.healthcareguy.com/2006/07/24/cchit-town-call/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2006/07/24/cchit-town-call/</link>
	<description>Shahid&#039;s healthcare IT, EMR, EHR, PHR, medical content, and document managment advisory service. Enjoy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pepe Fenjul Jr.</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2006/07/24/cchit-town-call/comment-page-1/#comment-2226</link>
		<dc:creator>Pepe Fenjul Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/?p=265#comment-2226</guid>
		<description>I totally agree that certification of a medical device doesn’t always mean that a device is suitable for all purposes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree that certification of a medical device doesn’t always mean that a device is suitable for all purposes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Borges, MD</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2006/07/24/cchit-town-call/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Borges, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 11:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/?p=265#comment-307</guid>
		<description>CCHIT has no value and its affect on market competition, innovation, and eventually on EMR prices is going to be a big negative.

Saying that forcing standards is a good thing sounds pretty, but why? Most EMRs are only tools that help physicians get the job done. Let the enduser- the adult, smart physician, decide what features they want in their EMR. Forcing standards onto a market in a way that favors the few &quot;enterprise&quot; EMR vendors is WRONG.

We need to end CCHIT and let market forces move HIT as it&#039;s done briskly in the past 5 years. More on this at http://emrupdate.com and on our statement on the controversy at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cchit.

Cheers,
Al</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CCHIT has no value and its affect on market competition, innovation, and eventually on EMR prices is going to be a big negative.</p>
<p>Saying that forcing standards is a good thing sounds pretty, but why? Most EMRs are only tools that help physicians get the job done. Let the enduser- the adult, smart physician, decide what features they want in their EMR. Forcing standards onto a market in a way that favors the few &#8220;enterprise&#8221; EMR vendors is WRONG.</p>
<p>We need to end CCHIT and let market forces move HIT as it&#8217;s done briskly in the past 5 years. More on this at <a href="http://emrupdate.com" rel="nofollow">http://emrupdate.com</a> and on our statement on the controversy at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cchit" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cchit</a>.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Al</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2006/07/24/cchit-town-call/comment-page-1/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 21:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/?p=265#comment-306</guid>
		<description>We have a lot of CCHIT discussions at EMRupdate.com
Why CCHIT will increase the overhead expenses:
http://www.emrupdate.com/forums/thread/57498.aspx

Complaint sent to FTC about CCHIT:
http://www.emrupdate.com/forums/thread/56115.aspx

An index of Anti-CCHIT initiatives:
http://www.emrupdate.com/forums/thread/56268.aspx

Another Certifying agency in USA:
http://www.emrupdate.com/forums/thread/57920.aspx

CCHIT will make 1 million dollars in first 6 mths:
http://www.emrupdate.com/forums/thread/57822.aspx

Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have a lot of CCHIT discussions at EMRupdate.com<br />
Why CCHIT will increase the overhead expenses:<br />
<a href="http://www.emrupdate.com/forums/thread/57498.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.emrupdate.com/forums/thread/57498.aspx</a></p>
<p>Complaint sent to FTC about CCHIT:<br />
<a href="http://www.emrupdate.com/forums/thread/56115.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.emrupdate.com/forums/thread/56115.aspx</a></p>
<p>An index of Anti-CCHIT initiatives:<br />
<a href="http://www.emrupdate.com/forums/thread/56268.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.emrupdate.com/forums/thread/56268.aspx</a></p>
<p>Another Certifying agency in USA:<br />
<a href="http://www.emrupdate.com/forums/thread/57920.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.emrupdate.com/forums/thread/57920.aspx</a></p>
<p>CCHIT will make 1 million dollars in first 6 mths:<br />
<a href="http://www.emrupdate.com/forums/thread/57822.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.emrupdate.com/forums/thread/57822.aspx</a></p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirby001</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2006/07/24/cchit-town-call/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirby001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/?p=265#comment-305</guid>
		<description>I generally agree with your view that the CCHIT process has value in this market. I&#039;d like to note, however, that the certifications to date have been of ambulatory EMRs, not systems for hospitals. A cert process for hospital-based EMRs is in the works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I generally agree with your view that the CCHIT process has value in this market. I&#8217;d like to note, however, that the certifications to date have been of ambulatory EMRs, not systems for hospitals. A cert process for hospital-based EMRs is in the works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FutureHIT - Speculations on the Future of Health IT</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2006/07/24/cchit-town-call/comment-page-1/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>FutureHIT - Speculations on the Future of Health IT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/?p=265#comment-304</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;CCHIT Town Call brings out the dogs and ponies&lt;/strong&gt;

I really want to believe in ONCHIT&#039;s and CCHIT&#039;s efforts. When the first round of certified systems was announced a week or so ago, I looked at the CCHIT documents, especially those arising from the process leading to the certification benchmarks, an...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>CCHIT Town Call brings out the dogs and ponies</strong></p>
<p>I really want to believe in ONCHIT&#8217;s and CCHIT&#8217;s efforts. When the first round of certified systems was announced a week or so ago, I looked at the CCHIT documents, especially those arising from the process leading to the certification benchmarks, an&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

