<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A free Ad-based EMR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.healthcareguy.com/2007/03/18/a-free-ad-based-emr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2007/03/18/a-free-ad-based-emr/</link>
	<description>Shahid&#039;s healthcare IT, EMR, EHR, PHR, medical content, and document managment advisory service. Enjoy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:54:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shahid N. Shah</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2007/03/18/a-free-ad-based-emr/comment-page-1/#comment-1281</link>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 05:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/index.php/archives/365#comment-1281</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the note, Steve. I will check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the note, Steve. I will check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shahid N. Shah</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2007/03/18/a-free-ad-based-emr/comment-page-1/#comment-1189</link>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/index.php/archives/365#comment-1189</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the note, Steve. I will check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the note, Steve. I will check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2007/03/18/a-free-ad-based-emr/comment-page-1/#comment-1188</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 13:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/index.php/archives/365#comment-1188</guid>
		<description>Good article here.  Eric&#039;s comment below about possibly losing data when a free system goes belly up does have some merit.  But since we covering Practice Fusion, take a look at another free EMR from Mitochon Systems (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mitochonsystems.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.mitochonsystems.com&lt;/a&gt;).  It&#039;s web based and even though they don&#039;t have the traction the PF does at this time it looks like it will contend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article here.  Eric&#39;s comment below about possibly losing data when a free system goes belly up does have some merit.  But since we covering Practice Fusion, take a look at another free EMR from Mitochon Systems (<a href="http://www.mitochonsystems.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mitochonsystems.com</a>).  It&#39;s web based and even though they don&#39;t have the traction the PF does at this time it looks like it will contend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Wichhart</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2007/03/18/a-free-ad-based-emr/comment-page-1/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Wichhart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/index.php/archives/365#comment-551</guid>
		<description>Okay on a second thought, what happens to your records (that you MUST keep for 5 years) all of a sudden disapears when this &quot;free&quot; service disapears after they figure out the business model is not a success? At least if the software is on your server you can run the program at its current state until you transition. If you have no data, you are *!#^@%#!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay on a second thought, what happens to your records (that you MUST keep for 5 years) all of a sudden disapears when this &#8220;free&#8221; service disapears after they figure out the business model is not a success? At least if the software is on your server you can run the program at its current state until you transition. If you have no data, you are *!#^@%#!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Leopold</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2007/03/18/a-free-ad-based-emr/comment-page-1/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Leopold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/index.php/archives/365#comment-550</guid>
		<description>EMRs have &quot;failed&quot; in the marketplace for many reasons, but perhaps the most important one is that doctors are afraid that EMRs will slow them down in the exam room.  Doctors are correct to fear that - as most EMRs are in fact slower than paper.  Paper is inefficient for many reason in the overall enterprise - but not in the exam room, where doctors have developed a highly efficient iconography for recording their exams.  At least in some specialties - we&#039;re in the  ophthalmology EMR business - specialty specific EMRs make all the difference.  We can really help our doctors get through the exam room experience faster.  It took us 7 years and a lot of work.  What we charge - which is on the high side - is less important to our customers than what we can accomplish.  I think there may well be a place for PracticeFusion, but at least in our specialty, price and delivery method (on-line) and secondary to performance and knowledge of the specific challenges faced by specific practices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EMRs have &#8220;failed&#8221; in the marketplace for many reasons, but perhaps the most important one is that doctors are afraid that EMRs will slow them down in the exam room.  Doctors are correct to fear that &#8211; as most EMRs are in fact slower than paper.  Paper is inefficient for many reason in the overall enterprise &#8211; but not in the exam room, where doctors have developed a highly efficient iconography for recording their exams.  At least in some specialties &#8211; we&#8217;re in the  ophthalmology EMR business &#8211; specialty specific EMRs make all the difference.  We can really help our doctors get through the exam room experience faster.  It took us 7 years and a lot of work.  What we charge &#8211; which is on the high side &#8211; is less important to our customers than what we can accomplish.  I think there may well be a place for PracticeFusion, but at least in our specialty, price and delivery method (on-line) and secondary to performance and knowledge of the specific challenges faced by specific practices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Mackie</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2007/03/18/a-free-ad-based-emr/comment-page-1/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Mackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 09:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/index.php/archives/365#comment-549</guid>
		<description>I think this is a particularly interesting approach.  At the end of the day most physicians are simply risk adverse, and a no-cost, on-demand approach may lower that initial hurdle.  I have been tracking these guys for some time and they have some interesting things brewing:

Practice Fusion, Top Health IT innovator 2007
http://www.fiercehealthit.com/innovators/2007/practicefusion

Abobe Showcases Practice Fusion
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/showcase/index.cfm?event=casestudydetail&amp;casestudyid=337687&amp;loc=en_us

Practice Fusion offers free EMRs to docs, paid for by ads
http://www.healthcareitnews.com/story.cms?id=6678

Wall Street Journal Features Practice Fusion
http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB117496231973149939-KNwQcxqRF_THaY0Zpk9KVsPHSR4_20080326.html?mod=tff_main_tff_top

Practice Fusion brings free, on demand service to physicians
http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=4670</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a particularly interesting approach.  At the end of the day most physicians are simply risk adverse, and a no-cost, on-demand approach may lower that initial hurdle.  I have been tracking these guys for some time and they have some interesting things brewing:</p>
<p>Practice Fusion, Top Health IT innovator 2007<br />
<a href="http://www.fiercehealthit.com/innovators/2007/practicefusion" rel="nofollow">http://www.fiercehealthit.com/innovators/2007/practicefusion</a></p>
<p>Abobe Showcases Practice Fusion<br />
<a href="http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/showcase/index.cfm?event=casestudydetail&amp;casestudyid=337687&amp;loc=en_us" rel="nofollow">http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/showcase/index.cfm?event=casestudydetail&amp;casestudyid=337687&amp;loc=en_us</a></p>
<p>Practice Fusion offers free EMRs to docs, paid for by ads<br />
<a href="http://www.healthcareitnews.com/story.cms?id=6678" rel="nofollow">http://www.healthcareitnews.com/story.cms?id=6678</a></p>
<p>Wall Street Journal Features Practice Fusion<br />
<a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB117496231973149939-KNwQcxqRF_THaY0Zpk9KVsPHSR4_20080326.html?mod=tff_main_tff_top" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB117496231973149939-KNwQcxqRF_THaY0Zpk9KVsPHSR4_20080326.html?mod=tff_main_tff_top</a></p>
<p>Practice Fusion brings free, on demand service to physicians<br />
<a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=4670" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=4670</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2007/03/18/a-free-ad-based-emr/comment-page-1/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/index.php/archives/365#comment-548</guid>
		<description>Also, as a reply to Shahid&#039;s concern about privacy, I would say that Practice Fusion only has to give Google access to parts of patients&#039; records. They can block access to all personal information displayed on a given form/page, so Google only reads medication, diagnosis etc. related information without knowing which patient it belongs to; taking care of privacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, as a reply to Shahid&#8217;s concern about privacy, I would say that Practice Fusion only has to give Google access to parts of patients&#8217; records. They can block access to all personal information displayed on a given form/page, so Google only reads medication, diagnosis etc. related information without knowing which patient it belongs to; taking care of privacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2007/03/18/a-free-ad-based-emr/comment-page-1/#comment-547</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/index.php/archives/365#comment-547</guid>
		<description>I agree with your assertion that most EMR&#039;s are databases that act like electronic typewriters and filing cabinets. These software need more intelligence and decision support which is very easy to implement given that vendors are ok to work with people like SNOMED and Elsevier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your assertion that most EMR&#8217;s are databases that act like electronic typewriters and filing cabinets. These software need more intelligence and decision support which is very easy to implement given that vendors are ok to work with people like SNOMED and Elsevier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trusted.MD Network</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2007/03/18/a-free-ad-based-emr/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Trusted.MD Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 08:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/index.php/archives/365#comment-546</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google Health: A Virtual-Doctor In Your Family...&lt;/strong&gt;

Roni Zeiger, MD, Product Manager at Google and part of Adam Bosworth&#039;s health team at Google has this recent post on the difficulty of patients getting the information they need....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google Health: A Virtual-Doctor In Your Family&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Roni Zeiger, MD, Product Manager at Google and part of Adam Bosworth&#8217;s health team at Google has this recent post on the difficulty of patients getting the information they need&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Seb</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2007/03/18/a-free-ad-based-emr/comment-page-1/#comment-545</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Seb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 01:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/index.php/archives/365#comment-545</guid>
		<description>Shahid,

Thank you for taking the time to mention us.  We have received a tremendous amount of excitement about the model from practices and health plans, alike.  Around the privacy side, we have worked extensively with out attorney, Davis Wright Tremaine and are completely secure and HIPAA compliant.

Best Regards,

Jonathan Seb
Practice Fusion, Inc
http://www.webwire.com/ViewPressRel.asp?aId=31264
practicefusion.typepad.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shahid,</p>
<p>Thank you for taking the time to mention us.  We have received a tremendous amount of excitement about the model from practices and health plans, alike.  Around the privacy side, we have worked extensively with out attorney, Davis Wright Tremaine and are completely secure and HIPAA compliant.</p>
<p>Best Regards,</p>
<p>Jonathan Seb<br />
Practice Fusion, Inc<br />
<a href="http://www.webwire.com/ViewPressRel.asp?aId=31264" rel="nofollow">http://www.webwire.com/ViewPressRel.asp?aId=31264</a><br />
practicefusion.typepad.com/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
