<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If you can&#039;t repeat it, don&#039;t bother automating it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.healthcareguy.com/2007/07/23/if-you-cant-repeat-it-dont-bother-automating-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2007/07/23/if-you-cant-repeat-it-dont-bother-automating-it/</link>
	<description>Shahid&#039;s healthcare IT, EMR, EHR, PHR, medical content, and document managment advisory service. Enjoy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest Article: What the low-tech checklist can teach techies about medical business processes and proper system design</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2007/07/23/if-you-cant-repeat-it-dont-bother-automating-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1846</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest Article: What the low-tech checklist can teach techies about medical business processes and proper system design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/index.php/archives/345#comment-1846</guid>
		<description>[...] often said that if you can&#8217;t repeat something, you can&#8217;t automate it &#8212; meaning trying to jump into creating software or systems before you have identified and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] often said that if you can&#8217;t repeat something, you can&#8217;t automate it &#8212; meaning trying to jump into creating software or systems before you have identified and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don’t drink the Kool-Aid: It’s ok to be afraid of bloated EMRs and ease into medical technology &#171; Healthcare</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2007/07/23/if-you-cant-repeat-it-dont-bother-automating-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1112</link>
		<dc:creator>Don’t drink the Kool-Aid: It’s ok to be afraid of bloated EMRs and ease into medical technology &#171; Healthcare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/index.php/archives/345#comment-1112</guid>
		<description>[...] As an experienced healthcare IT professional I am very happy to see that people are looking towards EMRs and automation to improve healthcare staff productivity. However, I&#8217;d like to urge a bit of caution and be sure that buyers don&#8217;t jump into the market for the wrong reason. My rule about automation and insertion of software in any workflow process is simple: if you can&#8217;t repeat it, don&#8217;t bother automating it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As an experienced healthcare IT professional I am very happy to see that people are looking towards EMRs and automation to improve healthcare staff productivity. However, I&#8217;d like to urge a bit of caution and be sure that buyers don&#8217;t jump into the market for the wrong reason. My rule about automation and insertion of software in any workflow process is simple: if you can&#8217;t repeat it, don&#8217;t bother automating it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don’t drink the Kool-Aid: It&#8217;s ok to be afraid of bloated EMRs and ease into medical technology</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2007/07/23/if-you-cant-repeat-it-dont-bother-automating-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1111</link>
		<dc:creator>Don’t drink the Kool-Aid: It&#8217;s ok to be afraid of bloated EMRs and ease into medical technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/index.php/archives/345#comment-1111</guid>
		<description>[...] As an experienced healthcare IT professional I am very happy to see that people are looking towards EMRs and automation to improve healthcare staff productivity. However, I&#8217;d like to urge a bit of caution and be sure that buyers don&#8217;t jump into the market for the wrong reason. My rule about automation and insertion of software in any workflow process is simple: if you can&#8217;t repeat it, don&#8217;t bother automating it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As an experienced healthcare IT professional I am very happy to see that people are looking towards EMRs and automation to improve healthcare staff productivity. However, I&#8217;d like to urge a bit of caution and be sure that buyers don&#8217;t jump into the market for the wrong reason. My rule about automation and insertion of software in any workflow process is simple: if you can&#8217;t repeat it, don&#8217;t bother automating it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Peacock</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2007/07/23/if-you-cant-repeat-it-dont-bother-automating-it/comment-page-1/#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Peacock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/index.php/archives/345#comment-600</guid>
		<description>..  and expanding a little on James&#039; comment, in order to repeat how it should be done, there should be an understanding how it is currently done - and that is certainly the cause of much angst in healthcare.  The reality is healthcare delivery is probably one of the most complex processes to re-engineer. How many projects suffer because the requirements of a stakeholder hidden away in a corner is met inadequately?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..  and expanding a little on James&#8217; comment, in order to repeat how it should be done, there should be an understanding how it is currently done &#8211; and that is certainly the cause of much angst in healthcare.  The reality is healthcare delivery is probably one of the most complex processes to re-engineer. How many projects suffer because the requirements of a stakeholder hidden away in a corner is met inadequately?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shahid N. Shah</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2007/07/23/if-you-cant-repeat-it-dont-bother-automating-it/comment-page-1/#comment-598</link>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 00:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/index.php/archives/345#comment-598</guid>
		<description>Good point, well said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, well said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2007/07/23/if-you-cant-repeat-it-dont-bother-automating-it/comment-page-1/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>James Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 23:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/index.php/archives/345#comment-599</guid>
		<description>Well I might say it a little differently. That they can clearly repeat how it should be done. Sometimes the lack of consistency in how something is done is a problem so the lack of consistency should not eliminate something from consideration, although it should increase the focus on organizaitonal change.
JT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I might say it a little differently. That they can clearly repeat how it should be done. Sometimes the lack of consistency in how something is done is a problem so the lack of consistency should not eliminate something from consideration, although it should increase the focus on organizaitonal change.<br />
JT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

