<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MedPedia medical Wiki lauching at the end of the year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.healthcareguy.com/2008/07/23/medpedia-medical-wiki-lauching-at-the-end-of-the-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2008/07/23/medpedia-medical-wiki-lauching-at-the-end-of-the-year/</link>
	<description>Shahid&#039;s healthcare IT, EMR, EHR, PHR, medical content, and document managment advisory service. Enjoy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lew</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2008/07/23/medpedia-medical-wiki-lauching-at-the-end-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator>Lew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/index.php/archives/431#comment-720</guid>
		<description>This is a scary concept, even with the assurances of review by qualified persons.
Nothing is 100%, and I don&#039;t think I would base a medical decision for me or my family from this type of website. Especially when I can research &quot;valid&quot; sites using Google for example.
And, all it will take is one bad entry with one or more bad affects (remember, nothing is 100%) and word will spread like wildfire over the net.
Sorry, reading about a hobby or for some periphiral information on a subject is what I depend on a wiki for, but for my health, nope, there are already too many chances taken with &quot;qualified&quot; professionals that might not be up on the latest and greatest. But a wiki, nope.
However, I wish Medipedia good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a scary concept, even with the assurances of review by qualified persons.<br />
Nothing is 100%, and I don&#8217;t think I would base a medical decision for me or my family from this type of website. Especially when I can research &#8220;valid&#8221; sites using Google for example.<br />
And, all it will take is one bad entry with one or more bad affects (remember, nothing is 100%) and word will spread like wildfire over the net.<br />
Sorry, reading about a hobby or for some periphiral information on a subject is what I depend on a wiki for, but for my health, nope, there are already too many chances taken with &#8220;qualified&#8221; professionals that might not be up on the latest and greatest. But a wiki, nope.<br />
However, I wish Medipedia good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

