<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And then there were 2: Drummond Group Plans to Certify Electronic Health Records</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.healthcareguy.com/2009/11/06/and-there-were-2-drummond-group-plans-to-certify-electronic-health-records/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2009/11/06/and-there-were-2-drummond-group-plans-to-certify-electronic-health-records/</link>
	<description>Shahid&#039;s healthcare IT, EMR, EHR, PHR, medical content, and document managment advisory service. Enjoy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:50:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sanberdino9</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2009/11/06/and-there-were-2-drummond-group-plans-to-certify-electronic-health-records/comment-page-1/#comment-1268</link>
		<dc:creator>sanberdino9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/?p=695#comment-1268</guid>
		<description>Have to respond here. Rik Drummond is one of the smartest, nicest and most charitable people I have ever met. If you think anybody, much less the Drummond Group, can influence Walmart to do anything they don&#039;t want to do then you need to drive your butt to rural Northwest Arkansas and you just  try to sell Walmart something. Maybe 3 years later Walmart will give you 1/10 of a penney on the dollar. There is nothing wrong with open source models, nothing wrong with for profit models and nothing wrong with for profit compliance services. Its a free market dude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to respond here. Rik Drummond is one of the smartest, nicest and most charitable people I have ever met. If you think anybody, much less the Drummond Group, can influence Walmart to do anything they don&#39;t want to do then you need to drive your butt to rural Northwest Arkansas and you just  try to sell Walmart something. Maybe 3 years later Walmart will give you 1/10 of a penney on the dollar. There is nothing wrong with open source models, nothing wrong with for profit models and nothing wrong with for profit compliance services. Its a free market dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanberdino9</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2009/11/06/and-there-were-2-drummond-group-plans-to-certify-electronic-health-records/comment-page-1/#comment-1123</link>
		<dc:creator>sanberdino9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/?p=695#comment-1123</guid>
		<description>Have to respond here. Rik Drummond is one of the smartest, nicest and most charitable people I have ever met. If you think anybody, much less the Drummond Group, can influence Walmart to do anything they don&#039;t want to do then you need to drive your butt to rural Northwest Arkansas and you just  try to sell Walmart something. Maybe 3 years later Walmart will give you 1/10 of a penney on the dollar. There is nothing wrong with open source models, nothing wrong with for profit models and nothing wrong with for profit compliance services. Its a free market dude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to respond here. Rik Drummond is one of the smartest, nicest and most charitable people I have ever met. If you think anybody, much less the Drummond Group, can influence Walmart to do anything they don&#39;t want to do then you need to drive your butt to rural Northwest Arkansas and you just  try to sell Walmart something. Maybe 3 years later Walmart will give you 1/10 of a penney on the dollar. There is nothing wrong with open source models, nothing wrong with for profit models and nothing wrong with for profit compliance services. Its a free market dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shahid N. Shah</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2009/11/06/and-there-were-2-drummond-group-plans-to-certify-electronic-health-records/comment-page-1/#comment-1102</link>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/?p=695#comment-1102</guid>
		<description>Danmunro, I think you&#039;re probably right. All this is too early to talk about until the government gets its documents prepared but I hope your right and we won&#039;t need any of these certifications bodies to get &quot;certified&quot;. Some &quot;self certification&quot; ability would be great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danmunro, I think you&#39;re probably right. All this is too early to talk about until the government gets its documents prepared but I hope your right and we won&#39;t need any of these certifications bodies to get &#8220;certified&#8221;. Some &#8220;self certification&#8221; ability would be great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danmunro</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2009/11/06/and-there-were-2-drummond-group-plans-to-certify-electronic-health-records/comment-page-1/#comment-1101</link>
		<dc:creator>danmunro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/?p=695#comment-1101</guid>
		<description>I actually see this as somewhat moot.  Federal $&#039;s (Meaningful Use) will become the ultimate arbiter - not some 3rd party.  CCHIT and Drummond are just hoping they can be middle men in that process.  It&#039;s still too early - but I do question how much either of them (and others to follow) will actually be needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually see this as somewhat moot.  Federal $&#39;s (Meaningful Use) will become the ultimate arbiter &#8211; not some 3rd party.  CCHIT and Drummond are just hoping they can be middle men in that process.  It&#39;s still too early &#8211; but I do question how much either of them (and others to follow) will actually be needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shahid N. Shah</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2009/11/06/and-there-were-2-drummond-group-plans-to-certify-electronic-health-records/comment-page-1/#comment-1085</link>
		<dc:creator>Shahid N. Shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/?p=695#comment-1085</guid>
		<description>Earl and Ralph, thanks for the comments; I don&#039;t know much about Drummond and was just happy to see that there was a second entity interested in certifications (which will hopefully mean others might join).

Perhaps some of us should get together and form a non-profit open-source (using creative commons materials) company that creates all the test cases and stuff and lets any company run the certifications?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earl and Ralph, thanks for the comments; I don&#8217;t know much about Drummond and was just happy to see that there was a second entity interested in certifications (which will hopefully mean others might join).</p>
<p>Perhaps some of us should get together and form a non-profit open-source (using creative commons materials) company that creates all the test cases and stuff and lets any company run the certifications?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph F Potter</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2009/11/06/and-there-were-2-drummond-group-plans-to-certify-electronic-health-records/comment-page-1/#comment-1086</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph F Potter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/?p=695#comment-1086</guid>
		<description>This is very bad - do you know the Drummond groups history or do you have an interest in the group?  This is a company that while adding no value to AS2, managed to screw many companies out of a lot of money through a similar schema - please vote no any any opportunity!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very bad &#8211; do you know the Drummond groups history or do you have an interest in the group?  This is a company that while adding no value to AS2, managed to screw many companies out of a lot of money through a similar schema &#8211; please vote no any any opportunity!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlW</title>
		<link>http://www.healthcareguy.com/2009/11/06/and-there-were-2-drummond-group-plans-to-certify-electronic-health-records/comment-page-1/#comment-1084</link>
		<dc:creator>EarlW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthcareguy.com/?p=695#comment-1084</guid>
		<description>No, I think it&#039;s terrible news.  Drummond Group singlehandedly crippled the EDI AS2 business.  Here are the facts:  R.Drummond was one of the writers of RFC 4130, which defined the secure interchange of data over HTTP.  This is also known as EDI-INT or AS2.  Drummond Group then went into business &#039;certifying&#039; AS2 software.  Their charge for certification?  $60,000 for certification plus $25,000 per year.  Then they convinced WalMart to insist that any AS2 software used with them was &#039;Drummond Certified&#039;.  This certification in no way guaranteed that two systems were able to communicate.  It only made a lot of money for Drummond and made it impossible for open-source solutions to compete.

Now they want to certify EHR?  Give me a break.

You had better ask them &quot;How much will it cost&quot;, before assuming this is good news.

PS:  Walmart no longer requires that AS2 software be &#039;Drummond Certified&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I think it&#8217;s terrible news.  Drummond Group singlehandedly crippled the EDI AS2 business.  Here are the facts:  R.Drummond was one of the writers of RFC 4130, which defined the secure interchange of data over HTTP.  This is also known as EDI-INT or AS2.  Drummond Group then went into business &#8216;certifying&#8217; AS2 software.  Their charge for certification?  $60,000 for certification plus $25,000 per year.  Then they convinced WalMart to insist that any AS2 software used with them was &#8216;Drummond Certified&#8217;.  This certification in no way guaranteed that two systems were able to communicate.  It only made a lot of money for Drummond and made it impossible for open-source solutions to compete.</p>
<p>Now they want to certify EHR?  Give me a break.</p>
<p>You had better ask them &#8220;How much will it cost&#8221;, before assuming this is good news.</p>
<p>PS:  Walmart no longer requires that AS2 software be &#8216;Drummond Certified&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
