
@ShahidNShah
With all the recent talk about eHealth 2.0, EMRs, PHRs, and consumer driven healthcare we may sometimes forget that some of us are involved in the dirty, rotten, tiresome, and difficult job of getting their firms paid for services. HIPAA did a decent job of standardizing electronic claims with the ASC X12 837 transaction sets and payers and clearinghouses were good about supporting it but one big thing was missing: attachments for documents required to prove the rendered services.
Well, after many years of hard work HHS’s proposed rules (NPRM) on healthcare claims attachments were published in late September (see the associated press release).
As most of us already know, the claims attachments proposal is designed to allow HL7-based Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) attachments to be sent along with ASC X12 transaction sets from providers to payers. There is a great deal of benefit for providers (hospitals, docs, etc) and payers will be coming along kicking and screaming for the most part.
What should you be doing about it?
By the way, the WEDI/HL7/X12/AFEHCT National Healthcare Claims Attachment Survey Final Report has been available for a couple months; the survey reports that most providers commonly send the following types of attachments to payers:
Shahid Shah is an internationally recognized enterprise software guru that specializes in digital health with an emphasis on e-health, EHR/EMR, big data, iOT, data interoperability, med device connectivity, and bioinformatics.
Connecting innovation decision makers to authoritative information, institutions, people and insights.
Medigy accurately delivers healthcare and technology information, news and insight from around the world.
Medigy surfaces the world's best crowdsourced health tech offerings with social interactions and peer reviews.
© 2025 Netspective Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Built on Mar 12, 2025 at 5:07am